As the only way to have all participants of a process (on process step level) is the usage of additional participants sometimes the process diagram gets "overloaded" with these symbols required more or less only for RACI purposes. The idea is to have a "switch" per type of responsibility which controls the visibility of the additional participants symbols within the process diagram on process level. The attached picture ...more »
The fields to be maintained can be configured by the administrators in case of risk and controls, similar to the quick model. This allows each administrator to configure and set the columns that are important to the business for the users.
For better coordination of interfaces and for process optimization, it would be useful if the output of a task / process would have to be matched with at least one input of a follow-up task / process. This would then again be confirmed by a "handshake" of both process owner / manager.
If an element is added from the "mouse over context menu", the element description must be added subsequently (except for the task) by double - clicking. That bothers the workflow. It would be better if the description could be entered directly after inserting the element without having to double-click the new element with the mouse. AND: a preference to turn this option on or off. 😘
If I share the process with 5 people, 1st person comments on it on first day, then 2nd person comments on it the second day, but in the expanded view of the process, I can just see the total no. of comments. In this way I have to open the process everyday and check for the delta comments. It would be very helpful if in the expanded view I can see the task where the comment is made, by whom and what is the comment or the ...more »
When calling a diagram, which has been edited in the meantime you have to choose which version you want. Here it would be good to be able to open the revision comparison to look at the 2 versions and decide which one rejects.
When I post a link to comment on multiple diagrams, the subject line is always "Sebastian Fochler invites you to comment on 2 diagrams" in the mail. I do not think that's good, because then you can not read on the subject of mail, which topic or process it is. It would be good if in the window that opens, if I invite someone to comment, in addition to the addressee and the mail text could also enter the subject.
Signavio's EPC template is still showing the traditional notation for EPC's. When importing an Aris EPC diagram into Signavio it is displayed in the old version of EPC instead of the newer version.
It happens often that you are modeling a process and realize that some activities actually would better be grouped into a subprocess. The current way to do this is relatively cumbersome.
It would be great if there was a shortcut for grouping activities into a subprocess. I would imagine being able to select the activities in question and activate the shortcut.
If the Documentation field for a collapsed subprocess is empty, it could automatically use the Documentation field of the process being referred to, so you can avoid duplicate documentation. This could for example be done with the same logic as the Dictionary (linked data which can be overwritten locally).
At the moment it is only possible to add a line at the end of your Editor for Attributes property of the Complex Class. This is very un user friendly. So if you want a line in between two other lines. You have to redo everything.
Our process map is structured in such a way that individual processes (eg enter A07.01 order) occur several times in the individual end-to-end processes (eg process for standard products or project business). All attributes (such as the description) must now be maintained individually for each end-to-end process, which is very time-consuming and error-prone, especially for changes. It would be useful if, at the level ...more »